All RAs were bilingual in English and Spanish. The RAs also completed a state-sponsored training program on HIV counseling and screening as well as a training program on rapid HIV screening. No patients tested positive for HIV in this study. Data analysis All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 11 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX). Participant screening and enrollment were summarized and diagramed per the Strengthening Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations [81]. Demographic characteristics, HIV screening history, alcohol misuse, sexual risk for HIV and reasons why participants

accepted or declined HIV testing were also summarized by sex. Data are reported using mean, median, standard http://www.selleckchem.com/products/ABT-888.html deviation (SD), and interquartile range (IQR) where appropriate. The percentage of days spent drinking in one month was calculated by Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical dividing the number of days spent drinking in one month by 31 days. Presence of binge drinking was determined by the aforementioned cutoffs of≥five drinks for men and≥four drinks for women [16]. The percentage of days spent binging was calculated by dividing the number of days spent binging by the number of total days spent drinking in one month. Percentage of days spent drinking in one month and percentage of days spent binging were converted into four levels (0-24%, 25-49%, 50-74%, 75-100%) because values were not normally distributed and Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical to aid in ease

of interpretation. For the AUDIT, participants were classified into at-risk drinking levels as recommended by Babor, Biddle, Saunders and Monteiro [23]. For men, a score of

indicated a harmful drinking level. A score of≥20 for men and≥18 for women determined a dependent drinking level. Based upon Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical their HIV Sexual Risk Questionnaire responses, all participants who reported no sexual intercourse within the past 12 months were eliminated from the study analysis. HIV sexual risk scores were calculated for those who reported having sexual intercourse within the past 12 months. Points for HIV sexual risk scores were assigned based on the reported type of sexual partner. We assigned one point for participants who reported having unprotected sex with their main partner, and two points Drug_discovery each for having unprotected sex with a casual partner and/or with an exchange partner. Additional points were assigned based upon the number of unprotected sexual partners and upon characteristics of the participant’s sexual partners (e.g. HIV this research status, injection- drug use and history of STD infection). The highest possible score was 209 for females and 514 for males. HIV sexual risk scores were transformed into a logarithmic scale because the scores were not normally distributed.