These databases were cross-referenced with the subject’s medical

These databases were cross-referenced with the subject’s medical record. Event rates were calculated per 1000 person-months. For each incidence rate comparison between LAIV recipients and a control group, a rate ratio was calculated. Rate comparisons of individual MAEs were made for each setting (clinic, ED, and hospital) separately; for PSDIs, comparisons were made for all settings combined. For MAEs occurring

in the hospital setting, any duration of inpatient hospitalization was considered, NVP-AUY922 mw whereas a hospitalization >24 h was required for an SAE. For each control group, rate comparisons were made for each period (3, 21 or 42 days, 6 months, entire study period) and setting (clinic, hospital, ED) as outlined in Table 1. Relative risks (RR) were calculated as the ratio of the incidence rates of the two comparison groups without adjustment for any covariate. Hazard ratios (HR) were also calculated adjusting for matching factors and seasonal buy Roxadustat changes in background rates. Adjusted HR were obtained from the Cox proportional hazards model implementing the counting-process style of input [16]. This style of input facilitated the use of calendar time as the time structure of the model which removes

any seasonal effects. A statistically significant increased risk associated with LAIV vaccination was declared if the lower bound of the exact 95% CI for the RR or the CI for the adjusted HR constructed from the Cox proportional model was >1.00. Likewise, a statistically significant decreased risk associated with LAIV vaccination was declared if the upper bound of either 95% CI was <1.00. Statistical significance was

determined prior to rounding. According to the prespecified data analysis plan, confidence intervals were constructed without adjustment for multiple comparisons. To facilitate interpretation of the results, a post hoc analysis was conducted using the Bonferroni method and statistical significance TCL was declared at the adjusted significance level of 0.000002. The sample size of 20,000 provided ≥90% power within each age group to observe a statistically significant increased relative risk if the true relative risk was ≥2.0 for events that occurred at a rate of 1 in 500 or if the true relative risk was ≥2.5 for events that occurred at a rate of 1 in 1000. For events that occurred at rates of 1 in 100 or 1 in 50, the study provided ≥90% power to observe a statistically significant increased relative risk if the true RR was ≥1.4 or ≥1.25, respectively. All analyses were performed using SAS® statistical software, Version 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A total of 21,340 subjects 18–49 years of age were vaccinated with the Ann Arbor strain LAIV during the 5 study seasons. LAIV recipients were matched to 21,340 unvaccinated subjects and 18,316 TIV recipients. Subject characteristics are summarized in Table 2.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>