Computer-controlled presentations of Gabor stimuli were then used to measure tuning for direction (eight directions) and temporal frequency (five frequencies) while the animal performed a fixation task. The direction that produced the strongest response was used as the preferred direction, the opposite Trichostatin A direction was used as the null direction, and a direction 90° from the preferred direction was used as the intermediate direction. The temporal frequency that produced the strongest response was used for all of the Gabors. The temporal frequency was rounded to a value that produced an integral number of cycles of drift

Selleckchem PI3K inhibitor during each stimulus presentation, so that the Gabors started and ended with odd spatial symmetry, such that the spatiotemporal integral of the luminance of each stimulus was the same as the background. Spatial frequency was set to 1 cycle per degree for all of the Gabors. The preferred Gabor was used to quantitatively map the receptive field location (three eccentricities and five polar angles)

while the animal performed a fixation task. The two stimulus locations within the receptive field were chosen to be at equal eccentricities from the fixation point and to give approximately equal responses, and the third location was 180° from the center point between the two receptive field locations, at an equal eccentricity from the fixation point as the other locations. Neurons were included in the analysis if they were held for at least two blocks each of both the normalization

and attention data Batroxobin collection, presented in alternating blocks. Approximately 13 repetitions of each stimulus condition were collected per block. Data analysis was performed on the response period of 50–250 ms after the stimulus onset. Firing rates for each stimulus condition of each neuron were determined by taking the average firing rate during this analysis period across all stimulus repetitions. Stimuli presented at the same time as a target or distractor stimulus were excluded from analysis, as were stimuli that appeared after the target, and the first one or two stimulus presentations (within 400 ms) of each stimulus series to reduce variance that could arise from stronger responses to the start of a stimulus series. Modulation indices for the modulations of firing rates reported in this study were calculated using a normalization modulation index, [(Preferred – Null) – (Both - Null)] / [(Preferred – Null) + (Both – Null)], or an attention modulation index, (Attend Preferred – Attend Null) / (Attend Preferred + Attend Null).