A primary use of an RTT would be in research on the efficacy and effectiveness of well-defined treatments that have an underlying theory explaining why they would be effective and for what classes of patients. For observational research, which entails

the description of interventions delivered by clinicians in ongoing clinical activities (eg, the previously mentioned PBE studies), the focus would be on the types of interventions and their frequency, timing, and sequence. A further focus on the nature or intensity of services across geographic divisions would enable “practice variations research,” a type of health services research practically unknown in rehabilitation. For experimental studies of rehabilitation treatments (randomized controlled trials and other trials), an RTT could be used in click here the

development of treatment protocols to enable the exact specification of the interventions that should be delivered with regard to the nature of treatment(s), dosages, timing, and so forth.106 An RTT would also be invaluable for validating fidelity to treatment protocols, quantifying the amount of treatment delivered, and selecting cases for efficacy analysis.7 and 107 Other potential research uses of an RTT lie in systematic reviews, especially meta-analyses, of intervention studies. When “similar” treatments reported in the literature have heterogeneous effect sizes, one way to obtain the homogeneity needed for mathematical synthesis is to create subsets of studies that differ from one another in terms of details of the treatments used. That is currently being done, to some degree, using check ad hoc classifications.108, Protein Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor 109 and 110 A well-developed and validated taxonomy would allow an approach that has a better theoretical foundation. The insufficient reporting on intervention approaches that characterizes much of the rehabilitation and other complex interventions literature may be a

stumbling block, but we may see changes in that area.39 and 111 Selection of appropriate treatments for the deficits of actual patients might appear an implausible clinical application. However, the old saying that there is nothing so practical as a good theory may be correct: given a set of theories underlying a classification of treatments, the therapist in selecting a particular treatment also must select (and agree with) the theory that links the treatment to the needed patient/client changes.112 To the degree that the theory specifies circumstances under which the treatment will or will not work (including intact strengths of the patients and characteristics of their environment), the taxonomy assists in rational selection of treatments. In the absence of such an advanced stage of theory development, record keeping and documentation by rehabilitation clinicians might be the second major area of application for the RTT.