For analysis, responses were collapsed into ‘Strongly Agree or Agree’, ‘Neutral’ and ‘Strongly Disagree or Disagree’. Participants were asked to respond to one item on confidence: How confident do you feel about discussing obesity with clients? (1 = very confident, 2 = confident, 3 = somewhat unsure, and 4 = completely unsure), and one item on training needs: Do you feel that you need

more training on how to discuss obesity with clients? (1 = yes, more training is essential, 2 = yes, more training would Navitoclax mw be useful, 3 = no, the training I have received is adequate, 4 = no, the training I have received is excessive). For analysis, responses were collapsed into ‘Very confident or confident’ and ‘Less confident or unconfident’, and ‘Yes, more training is useful or essential’ and ‘No, more training is not required’, respectively. In the final section, participants were asked record their educational degree, year of study, gender, age, weight, and height. Participants were not asked any information regarding their ethnic background AZD2281 in vivo as previous research involving trainee HCPs studying at The University of Nottingham

demonstrated little variance with the majority being Caucasian [50]. This study received approval from the Nottingham University Medical School Ethics Committee. All responses were anonymous. Participants were considered to have consented to taking part in the study if they completed and returned a questionnaire. By way of a small token of appreciation, participants were offered the opportunity to enter a prize-draw

to win one of three £50 book vouchers. Data Adenosine triphosphate entry was conducted by three members of the research team. A randomly selected 10% sample of each members’ data was checked by an independent researcher for accuracy of entry and revealed an error rate of <1%; below the threshold considered to have any significant effect on the data analysis [51]. Prior to analysis, the data set was screened for missing values, normality and univariate outliers [52]. Categorical demographic data were analyzed for differences between student groups using Chi-squared tests. As continuous demographic data were non-Gaussian, analyses relating to student group effects employed Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance tests followed up with post hoc Mann–Whitney U-tests. As the distribution of scores of the 11 preferred terms approximated to normal, a one-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to compare scores. A post hoc analysis was performed using Tukey’s studentized range test to identify statistically significant difference between pairs of terms. A one-way between-groups MANOVA was also conducted to investigate sex differences and differences between the courses that students were registered on. Once again, post hoc analysis was performed using Tukey’s studentized range test to identify statistically significant difference between pairs of terms.