Here, we investigated carbonaceous aerosols in particulate matter

Here, we investigated carbonaceous aerosols in particulate matter (PM) monthly in the industrial area of Delhi in 2011. The concentrations of organic C and elemental C in PM10 fraction were analyzed. Results show a clear seasonal variability of organic and elemental C. PM10 ranged 95.9-453.5 mu g m(-3), organic C ranged 28.8-159.4 mu g m(-3), and elemental C ranged 7.5-44.0 mu g m(-3); those values were higher than reported values. Organic and elemental C were correlated with each other in pre-monsoon and winter seasons, implying the existence of similar emission

sources such as coal combustion, biomass burning and vehicular exhaust. The annual average contribution of total carbonaceous aerosols in PM10 was estimated as 62 %.”
“Little JNJ-26481585 inhibitor evidence is available addressing biomechanical properties of posterior distraction

forces and their effects on anterior spinal column in the growing rod technique. The question is often asked if posterior distraction forces may be kyphogenic. The goal of this study is to determine whether posterior distraction forces transmitted anteriorly through different foundation constructs (i.e., screws vs. hooks) affect intradiscal pressure. Six skeletally immature porcine spines were harvested leaving soft tissues and rib heads intact. Pedicle screws served as the lower foundation on a L3-L4 motion segment while pedicle screws and laminar hooks were randomly used at T3-T4 ISRIB levels. Proximal GSK J4 Epigenetics inhibitor constructs (hook vs. screw) were switched after initial distraction testing. The dual rod distractor was instrumented with strain gauges and calibrated using a custom force transducer. During distraction, intradiscal pressures immediately inferior to the superior foundation and the level equidistant between foundations were measured using needle pressure transducers. Maximum distraction force and maximum anterior disc pressure change were compared between hook and pedicle screw anchors using one-way ANOVA (p smaller than 0.05). Upper foundations with pedicle screws had significantly greater distraction forces (416 +/- A 101 N) than those with

upper level hooks (349 +/- A 100 N). There were no significant differences in disc pressures between levels or between upper foundation constructs. Disc pressures adjacent to the upper foundation demonstrated greater reduction (disc expansion) than the level equidistant within the construct. Pedicle screw constructs demonstrated greater endplate separation (distraction) compared to hook constructs. Posterior distraction forces result in anterior disc separation (distraction) and are distributed across multiple levels rather than delivered to the disc immediately adjacent to a foundation. Constructs with upper foundation hooks had lower distraction forces possibly due to hook motion during distraction. The load distribution at multiple levels may assist with curve control and may affect vertebral growth.

Comments are closed.