However, there was a predominance of helminthic infestation with Ascaris lumbricoides (22%) leading the list followed by Ancylostoma duodenale (20%). The data is shown in the ensuing table (Table 1). Table 1 Parasites isolated from the stool samples of AIDS patients and normal controls Parasites isolated HIV positive patients (Cases, no = 450) HIV negative persons (Control, no = 200) selleck Cryptosporidium spp. 163(36.22%) 42(21%) Microsporidia spp. 104(23.11%) – Cyclospora spp. 92(20.44%) 3(1.5%) Giardia spp. 40(8.89%) HM781-36B manufacturer – Entamoeba spp. 12(2.67%) 4(2%) Isospora belli

2(0.44%) – Ancylostoma duodenale 25(5.56%) 40(20%) Trichuris trichiura 16(3.56%) – Hymenolepsis nana 2(0.44%) 6(3%) Ascaris lumbricoides – 44(22%) Mixed infections 97(21.55%) – The sensitivity of direct microscopy was found to be 63.19% for Cryptosporidium spp. and 65.22% for Cyclospora Selleck HMPL-504 spp. whereas; the specificity was 93.03% and 97.21% for Cryptosporidium spp. and Cyclospora spp. respectively. However, after concentration of the stool samples the sensitivity increased to 74.84% and 78.26% for the two organisms (Table 2). Table 2 Comparison of the Diagnostic Methods for the identification of the enteric protozoa Organisms Microscopy Staining

Fluorescent microscopy ELISA   Direct After concentration Saffranin Acid Fast Autoflourescence Calcoflour White Calcoflour White + DAPI   Cryptosporidium spp. Sensitivity 63.19% 74.23% 83.44% 90.79% – - – 92.02% Specificity 93.03% 95.82% 98.26% 97.91% – - – 96.12% PPV 83.74% 90.98% 96.45% 96.1% – - – 97.4% NPV 81.65% 86.75% 91.26% 94.93% – - – 88.39% Microsporidia spp. Sensitivity – - – - – 95.19% 97.12% – Specificity – - – - – 97.69% 98.55% – PPV – - – - – 92.52% 95.28% – NPV – - – - – 98.54% 99.13% – Cyclospora spp. Sensitivity 65.22% 78.26% 89.13% 85.87% 97.83% – - – Specificity 97.21% 98.04% 99.16% 98.6% 100% – - – PPV 85.71% 91.14% 96.47% 94.05% 100% – - – NPV 91.58% 94.61% 97.26% 96.45% 99.44% – - – PPV- Positive predictive value, NPV- Negative predictive value

The Cryptosporidium oocysts (4-6 μm) took up the Safranin stain and appeared reddish-orange against a green background. However, only a small proportion of selleck chemical the oocysts stained uniformly. On the other hand, Cyclospora oocysts (8-10 μm) appeared as uniformly stained red to reddish-orange structures. Safranin staining showed 83.44% sensitivity and 98.26% specificity for detecting Cryptosporidium spp. whereas; it was found to be 89.13% sensitive and 99.16% specific for Cyclospora spp. identification. While screening, the technique missed out 27 samples of Cryptosporidium spp. and 10 of Cyclospora spp. which were found positive by other methods. On Kinyoun’s staining the Cryptosporidium oocysts stained as discernable light pink to bright red structures against a green background. It was 90.79% sensitive and 97.91% specific.