The seroprevalence

of N. caninum and T. gondii were significantly higher in pregnant cows than aborted cows (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). As a result, the comprehensive data generated through this study can significantly contribute to understanding of serologic association of N. caninum with T gondii, B. abortus and L monocytogenes in pregnant and aborted dairy cows. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“Background: Evidence-based preventive services offer profound health benefits, yet Americans receive only half of indicated care. A variety of government and specialty society policy initiatives are promoting the adoption of information technologies to engage patients in their care, such as personal health records, but current systems may not utilize the technology’s full potential.\n\nMethods: Using a previously described model to make information

technology Quizartinib clinical trial more patient-centered, we developed https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ldk378.html an interactive preventive health record (IPHR) designed to more deeply engage patients in preventive care and health promotion. We recruited 14 primary care practices to promote the IPHR to all adult patients and sought practice and patient input in designing the IPHR to ensure its usability, salience, and generalizability. The input involved patient usability tests, practice workflow observations, learning collaboratives, and patient feedback. Use of the IPHR was measured using practice appointment and IPHR databases.\n\nResults: The IPHR that emerged from this process generates tailored patient recommendations based on guidelines from the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force and other organizations. It extracts clinical data from the practices’ electronic medical record and AC220 inhibitor obtains health risk assessment information from patients. Clinical content is translated and explained in lay language. Recommendations

review the benefits and uncertainties of services and possible actions for patients and clinicians. Embedded in recommendations are self management tools, risk calculators, decision aids, and community resources – selected to match patient’s clinical circumstances. Within six months, practices had encouraged 14.4% of patients to use the IPHR (ranging from 1.5% to 28.3% across the 14 practices). Practices successfully incorporated the IPHR into workflow, using it to prepare patients for visits, augment health behavior counseling, explain test results, automatically issue patient reminders for overdue services, prompt clinicians about needed services, and formulate personalized prevention plans.\n\nConclusions: The IPHR demonstrates that a patient-centered personal health record that interfaces with the electronic medical record can give patients a high level of individualized guidance and be successfully adopted by busy primary care practices. Further study and refinement are necessary to make information systems even more patient-centered and to demonstrate their impact on care.