Appl Phys Lett 2008, 93:233119.CrossRef

36. Zheng Y-Z, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen J-F, Zhou W, Tao X: Dual-functional ZnO nanorod aggregates as scattering layer in the photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Commun 2011, 47:11519–21.CrossRef 37. Chao Y-C, Chen C-Y, Lin C-A, Dai Y-A, He J-H: Antireflection effect of ZnO nanorod arrays. J Mater Chem 2010, 20:8134–8138.CrossRef 38. Jehl Z, Rousset J, Donsanti F, Renou G, Naghavi N, Lincot D: Electrodeposition of ZnO nanorod arrays on ZnO substrate with tunable orientation and optical properties. Nanotechnology 2010, 21:395603.CrossRef 39. Burkhard GF, Hoke ET, McGehee MD: Accounting for interference, scattering, PF-562271 and electrode absorption to make accurate internal quantum efficiency measurements in organic and other thin solar cells. Adv Mater 2010, 22:3293–3297.CrossRef 40. Chandrasekaran J, Nithyaprakash D, Ajjan KB, Maruthamuthu S, Manoharan D, Kumar S: Hybrid solar cell based on blending of organic and inorganic materials–an overview. Renew. Sust. Energ.

Rev 2012, 15:1228–1238.CrossRef 41. Lee S, Kim D, Kim J, Lee G, Park J: Effect of metal-reflection and surface-roughness properties on power-conversion efficiency for polymer photovoltaic cells. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113:21915–21920.CrossRef 42. Reinhard M, Conradt J, Braun M, Colsmann A, Lemmer U, Kalt H: Zinc oxide nanorod arrays hydrothermally grown on a highly conductive polymer Angiogenesis inhibitor for inverted polymer solar cells. Synth Met 2012, 162:1582–1586.CrossRef 43. Olson DC, Piris J, Collins RT, Shaheen SE,

Ginley DS: Hybrid photovoltaic devices of polymer and ZnO nanofiber composites. Thin Solid Films 2006, 496:26–29.CrossRef 44. Sung Y-M, Hsu F-C, Wang D-Y, Wang I-S, Chen C-C, Liao H-C, Su W-F, Chen Y-F: Enhanced charge extraction in inverted hybrid photovoltaic cells assisted by graphene nanoflakes. J Mater Chem 2011, 21:17462.CrossRef 45. Chen J-Y, Hsu F-C, Sung Y-M, Chen Y-F: Enhanced charge transport in hybrid polymer/ZnO-nanorod solar Forskolin manufacturer cells assisted by conductive small molecules. J Mater Chem 2012, 22:15726.CrossRef 46. Olson DC, Lee Y-J, White MS, Kopidakis N, Shaheen SE, Ginley DS, Voigt J a, Hsu JWP: Effect of ZnO processing on the photovoltage of ZnO/poly(3-hexylthiophene) solar cells. J Phys Chem C 2008, 112:9544–9547.CrossRef 47. Olson DC, Lee Y-J, White MS, Kopidakis N, Shaheen SE, Ginley DS, Voigt JA, Hsu JWP: Effect of polymer processing on the performance of poly(3-hexylthiophene)/ZnO nanorod photovoltaic devices. J Phys Chem C 2007, 111:16640–16645.CrossRef 48. Iza DC, Muñoz-Rojas D, Jia Q, Swartzentruber B, Macmanus-Driscoll JL: Tuning of defects in ZnO nanorod arrays used in bulk heterojunction solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2012, 7:655.CrossRef 49.

PubMedCentralPubMed 50. Tadokoro H, Umezu T, Ohyashiki K, Hirano T, Ohyashiki JH: Exosomes derived from hypoxic leukemia cells enhance tube formation

in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 2013,288(48):34343–34351.PubMed 51. Zeng L, He X, Wang Y, Tang Y, Zheng C, Cai H, Liu J, Wang Y, Fu Y, Yang GY: MicroRNA-210 overexpression induces angiogenesis and neurogenesis in the normal adult mouse brain. Gene Ther 2014, 21:37–43.PubMed 52. Chan SY, Zhang YY, Hemann C, Mahoney CE, Zweier JL, Loscalzo J: MicroRNA-210 controls mitochondrial metabolism during hypoxia by repressing the iron-sulfur cluster assembly proteins ISCU1/2. Cell Metab 2009,10(4):273–284.PubMedCentralPubMed 53. Chen Z, Li Y, Zhang H, Huang P, Luthra R: Hypoxia-regulated microRNA-210 modulates selleck inhibitor mitochondrial function and decreases ISCU and COX10 expression. Oncogene 2010,29(30):4362–4368.PubMed 54. Favaro E, Ramachandran A, McCormick R, Gee H, Blancher C, Crosby M, Devlin C, Blick C, Buffa F, Li JL, Vojnovic B, Pires das Neves R, Glazer P, Iborra F, Ivan M, Ragoussis J, Harris AL: MicroRNA-210 regulates mitochondrial free radical response to hypoxia and krebs cycle in cancer cells by targeting iron sulfur cluster protein ISCU. PLoS One 2010,5(4):e10345.PubMedCentralPubMed 55. Puissegur MP, Mazure NM, Bertero T, Pradelli L, Grosso S, Robbe-Sermesant K, Maurin T, Lebrigand K, Cardinaud B, Hofman V, Fourre S, Magnone V, Ricci JE, Pouysségur J, Gounon P, Hofman P,

Barbry P, Mari B: miR-210 is overexpressed in late stages of lung cancer and mediates mitochondrial alterations associated Poziotinib order with modulation of HIF-1 activity. Cell Death Differ 2011,18(3):465–478.PubMedCentralPubMed Farnesyltransferase 56. Colleoni F, Padmanabhan N, Yung HW, Watson ED, Cetin I, van Patot MC T, Burton GJ, Murray AJ: Suppression of mitochondrial electron transport chain function in the hypoxic human placenta: a role for miRNA-210 and protein synthesis inhibition. PLoS One 2013,8(1):e55194.PubMedCentralPubMed

57. Grosso S, Doyen J, Parks SK, Bertero T, Paye A, Cardinaud B, Gounon P, Lacas-Gervais S, Noel A, Pouyssegur J, Barbry P, Mazure NM, Mari B: MiR-210 promotes a hypoxic phenotype and increases radioresistance in human lung cancer cell lines. Cell Death Dis 2013, 4:e544.PubMedCentralPubMed 58. Bertero T, Robbe-Sermesant K, Le Brigand K, Ponzio G, Pottier N, Rezzonico R, Mazure NM, Barbry P, Mari B: microRNAs target identification: lessons from hypoxamiRs. Antioxid Redox Signal 2013. 59. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011,144(5):646–674.PubMed 60. Liu Y, Han Y, Zhang H, Nie L, Jiang Z, Fa P, Gui Y, Cai Z: Synthetic miRNA-mowers targeting miR-183–96–182 cluster or miR-210 inhibit growth and migration and induce apoptosis in bladder cancer cells. PLoS One 2012,7(12):e52280.PubMedCentralPubMed 61. Fasanaro P, Romani S, Voellenkle C, Maimone B, Capogrossi MC, Martelli F: ROD1 is a seedless target gene of hypoxia-induced miR-210. PLoS One 2012,7(9):e44651.PubMedCentralPubMed 62.

Interestingly, as the melanoma

DNA yield decreased, there Sirolimus order was little drop-off in the percentage of BRAF or NRAS mutations detected using either ARMS or sequencing. This would suggest that even at low DNA assay input the samples were representative of the tumours and that at low DNA input there were probably few, if any, false negative results. Analysing all samples was a good strategy to maximise the numbers of mutations detected in this study set where 88% of the samples yielded detectable DNA. In a research setting one of the strengths of sequencing is that it detects unknown mutations as well as known ones. However, in a clinical setting it is likely that decisions will be made on the basis of known characterised mutations. When analysing genes Bioactive Compound high throughput screening where mutations are found clustered in one or two exons, like KRAS, much less DNA is required for sequencing than for ARMS, although this can be reduced by multiplexing ARMS reactions. This can be an advantage when only very

small biopsies with low DNA are available. Sequencing also offers an advantage when genes contain many mutations throughout the coding region, such as p53, BRCA and APC. To develop the potentially hundreds of individual mutation detection assays required would be extremely time-consuming and require positive mutation controls to show mafosfamide that the assays are functioning correctly. Sequencing reactions tend to be easier to develop and standard genomic DNA is an adequate control. It was important when performing sequencing that at least two independent PCRs were

performed from the original genomic DNA to eliminate false positive errors. We were able to distinguish true mutations from artefactual mutations by only accepting mutations detected in at least two amplicons in forward and reverse sequencing directions. Approximately 2% of the exons sequenced contained an artefact. These were most commonly detected in samples with low DNA, probably because they were not masked by more abundant unaltered DNA. These artefacts are presumably caused by damage to the DNA during fixation in formalin. None of the artefacts found in singleton were known mutations. They were not reproducible in any subsequent PCR from the original DNA samples and we were unable to validate them using other mutation discovery methods including denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography, and cloning and sequencing. ARMS appeared to be less affected by DNA artefacts as the assays only targeted known mutations. Pathology information was also taken into account as this could often explain why mutations were present at a low level in a sample.

1 and a fold change (FC) ≥ 1.5 were further analyzed. With IPA, the following functions were found to be significantly affected by dexamethasone (listed in the order of significance from highest to lowest): cell death,

small molecular biochemistry, immunological disease, cellular movement, cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, immune cell trafficking, antigen presentation, cell-mediated immune response, humoral immune response, inflammatory response, respiratory disease, cell signaling, infectious disease, organ injury and abnormality, and free radical selleck inhibitor scavenging. These functions were also affected by Pneumocystis infection, but in a different order of significance (also listed in the order of significance from highest to lowest): antigen presentation, cell-mediated immune response, humoral immune response, and inflammatory learn more response were equally and most severely affected, followed by cellular movement, immune cell trafficking, immunological disease, cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, cell death, organ injury and abnormality, cell signaling, infectious disease, small molecular biochemistry, antimicrobial response, and free radical scavenging (Fig. 3). Figure 3 Functions affected by dexamethasone or Pneumocystis infection. Cellular functions identified by IPA as being affected by dexamethasone or Pneumocystis infection are illustrated with

bar graphs based on the levels of -log(p-value), the higher the levels the more significant of the effect. Black bars indicate functions affected by dexamethasone treatment, while open bars denote those affected by Pneumocystis infection. The functions that were affected by Pneumocystis infection were further classified into four major groups: immune response, inflammation, cell death, and phagocytosis (Fig. 4). The immune response group included cell-mediated immune response, humoral immune response, and antigen presentation.

The cell death group included cell death and organ injury and abnormality; while cell signaling, cell-to-cell interaction, cell movement, anti-microbial response, immune cell trafficking, and free radical scavenging were included in the phagocytosis group. Genes that were differentially expressed due to Pneumocystis infection not dexamethasone treatment in each group are Fludarabine concentration shown in Table 1. It is interesting to note that these four functions share many of the same genes. Among these, Lgals1, Alcam, and Cd55 genes were down regulated; while Sod2, Soc3, Prf1, Il10, Mmp7, Sell, Psmb9, Oas1a, Clu, Ccr1, Mx1, Il8rb, Ccr5, Ccl5, Irf7, Nos2, and Cxcl10 genes were up regulated in all four functional groups. Cat and Hip1 genes that belong to both the cell death and phagocytosis groups were down regulated. In the cell death group, Hdac2, Bnip3L, Nr1h3, and Ppp6C genes were down regulated, and the Tap2 gene was up regulated.

Commun Inst For Fenn 94:1–24 Baier P, Pennerstorfer J, Schopf A (2007) PHENIPS—a comprehensive phenology model of Ips typographus (L.) (Col. www.selleckchem.com/products/dinaciclib-sch727965.html Scolytidae) as a tool for hazard rating of bark beetle infestation. For Ecol Manag 249:171–186CrossRef Bakke A (1989) The recent Ips typographus outbreak in Norway—experiences from a control program. Holarct Ecol 12:515–519 Barański S, Krysztofik E (1978)

Dotychczasowa gospodarka leśna na obszarze Świętokrzyskiego Parku Narodowego i otuliny. Świętokrzyski Park Narodowy, Bodzentyn Borkowski A, Podlaski R (2005) A method of estimation of the total density of infestation of Scots pine stems by the larger pine shoot beetle (Tomicus piniperda L.). Fol For Pol Ser A 47:25–32 Bouget C, Duelli P (2004)

The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review. Biol Conserv 118:281–299CrossRef Buse J, Schröder B, Assmann T (2007) Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle—a case study for saproxylic insect conservation. Biol Conserv 137:372–381CrossRef Butovitsch V (1971) Undersökningar över skadeinsekternas uppträdande i de stormhärjade skogarna i mellersta Norrlands kustland ären 1967–69. Inst Skogszool Rapp Upps 8:1–204 Christiansen E, Waring RH, Berryman AA (1987) Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships. For Ecol Manag 22:89–106CrossRef Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques. Wiley, Obeticholic Acid concentration New York Dutilleul P, Nef L, Frigon D (2000) Assessment of site characteristics as predictors of the vulnerability of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) stands to attack by Ips typographus L. (Col., Scolytidae). J Appl Entomol 124:1–5CrossRef Eidmann HH (1992) Impact of bark beetles on forests and forestry in Sweden. J Appl Entomol 114:193–200CrossRef Erbilgin N, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Zeneli G, Gershenzon J (2006) Exogenous application of methyl jasmonate elicits defenses in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and reduces host colonisation by the bark

beetle Ips typographus. Oecologia 148:426–436PubMedCrossRef Eriksson M, Pouttu A, Roininen H (2005) The influence of Methane monooxygenase windthrow area and timber characteristics on colonization of wind-felled spruces by Ips typographus (L.). For Ecol Manag 216:105–116CrossRef Eriksson M, Lilja S, Roininen H (2006) Dead wood creation and restoration burning: implications for bark beetles and beetle induced tree deaths. For Ecol Manag 231:205–213CrossRef Eriksson M, Neuvonen S, Roininen H (2007) Retention of wind-felled trees and the risk of consequential tree mortality by the European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in Finland. Scand J For Res 22:516–523CrossRef Eriksson M, Pouttu A, Roininen H (2008) Ips typographus (L.) attack on patches of felled trees: “wind-felled” vs. cut trees and the risk of subsequent mortality.

Isolate identification Isolates were identified by means of HaeIII recA restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and species-specific PCRs as previously reported [55]. RFLP profiles were compared with those of published reference strains as appropriate. All Italian isolates have been identified at the species level in previous works [19, 20, 22, 52, 53]. Fourteen Mexican isolates characterized by recA RFLP profile J’

were identified as B. cenocepacia IIIB, while 12 Mexican isolates showing the recA RFLP ABT-263 supplier profile AD were assigned to BCC6 group (present study). Two Mexican isolates with the RFLP profile I (which gave uncertain identification) and two Mexican isolates with RFLP profiles which were never recovered among BCC reference strains examined were assigned to B. cenocepacia IIIB by MLST analysis (Table 1) [22]. MLRT characterization and data analysis DNA preparation, PCR amplification of nearly complete sequence of five open reading frames of recA, gyrB, fliC, cepIR and dsbA genes, enzymatic restriction digests and separation of the resulting restriction fragments were performed as described previously [26]. Gel

images were digitalized using GelDoc 2000 (Bio-Rad) and stored as TIFF files. Different KU-60019 manufacturer restriction patterns for each locus were considered to represent separate alleles, and an arbitrary number was assigned to each allele. The different combinations of alleles for the five loci represented different allelic profiles. An arbitrary number Cell Penetrating Peptide [restriction type (RT)] was assigned to each allelic profile. The different restriction patterns found at each locus were analysed with DNA START-2 (Sequence Type Analysis and Recombination Test, version 2) software package http://​pubmlst.​org/​software/​analysis/​start2/​[56]. RT data sets were also analyzed using the eBURST (Based Upon Related Sequence Types) algorithm v3 http://​eburst.​mlst.​net/​. MLRT profiles were also analyzed by means of BioNumerics (Applied Maths) software 6.0. Cluster analysis was carried out on data

defined as character type data. A similarity matrix was created by using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means algorithm (UPGMA) in order to assess the genetic relationships between the restriction profiles. The cophenetic correlation coefficient was used as a statistical method to estimate the error associated with dendrogram branches, while the Cluster Cutoff method was applied to define the most reliable clusters. Linkage disequilibrium analysis The genetic diversity at individual loci (h), the mean genetic diversity (H mean ) and the standardized index of association ( ) were calculated using the LIAN version 3.5 software program (Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics University of Applied Sciences Weihenstephan; http://​adenine.​biz.​fh-weihenstephan.​de/​cgi-bin/​lian/​lian.​cgi.​pl) [57].

[53]. When RT-PCR was used to assess the reliability of the microarray hybridizations germlings were exposed to a novel growth curve (new RNA samples, not stocks of the original RNA used in the array experiment). Real-time RT PCR reactions All the PCR and RT-PCR reactions were performed using an ABI 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA). Taq-Man™ Universal PCR Master Mix kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) was used for PCR reactions. The reactions and calculations were performed according to Semighini et al. [49]. The primers and Lux™ fluorescent probes (Invitrogen, USA) used in this work are described in Additional file CAL-101 chemical structure 4, Table S3. Staining and microscopy For cell imaging of RcnA fused to GFP, conidiospores

were grown in glass-bottom dishes (Mattek Corporation, USA) in 2 click here ml of MM+2% glycerol for 24 hours at 30°C. All the confocal images were analysed using the Leica TCS SP5 laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany) (Laboratory of Confocal Microscopy, FMRP-USP, Brazil) using 63× magnification water immersion objective lens using laser lines 488 nm for GFP and 405 nm for DAPI. Images were captured by direct acquisition with the Leica LAS

AF software (Leica Microsystems) and additional processing was carried out using Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, CA). DNA manipulations and construction of the Aspergilli conditional mutants DNA manipulations were according to Sambrook and Russell [54]. All PCR reactions were performed using Platinum Taq DNA Polimerase High Fidelity (Invitrogen). For the DNA-mediated transformation, the deletion cassettes were constructed by “”in vivo”" recombination in S. cerevisiae as previously described by Colot et al. [55]. About 2.0-kb regions on either side of the ORFs were selected for primer design. For the construction of the A. fumigatus rcnA deletion, Baf-A1 purchase the primers calp-Afu P1 and calp-Afu P2 were used to amplify the 5′-UTR flanking region of the targeted ORF. The primers calp-Afu P3 and calp-Afu P4 were used to amplify the 3′-UTR ORF flanking region. For

the construction of the A. nidulans rcnA deletion, the primers calp-Ani P1 and calp-Ani P2 were used to amplify the 5′-UTR flanking region of the targeted ORF. The primers calp-Ani P3 and calp-Ani P4 were used to amplify the 3′-UTR ORF flanking region. Both fragments 5- and 3-UTR were PCR-amplified from genomic DNA using as templates the A4 strain for A. nidulans and AFU293 for A. fumigatus cassettes. The pyrG used in the Aspergilli cassettes for generating both deletion strains was used as marker for auxotrophy and were amplified (by using primers pyrG Fw and pyrG Rw) from pCDA21 plasmid [56]. Cassettes generation was achieved by transforming each fragment for each construction along with the plasmid pRS426 BamHI/EcoRI cut in the in S. cerevisiae strain SC9421 by the lithium acetate method [57]. The DNA of the yeast transformants was extracted by the method described by Goldman et al.

The ROS content was 1.8, 2.9, and 4.7 times higher compared to the control levels in RTL-W1 cells, 1.5, 1.9, and 3.2 times higher than in T47Dluc cells, and 1.2, 1.4, and 2.2 times higher

than in H295R cells following incubation with CNT at 12.50, 25, and 50 mg/L, respectively (Figure  5). The lowest observed effect concentration (LOEC) was 12.50 mg/L for RTL-W1 and T47Dluc cells, with a no observed effect concentration (NOEC) of 6.25 mg/L. For H295R cells, higher LOEC and NOEC were determined amounting to 25 and 12.5 mg CNT/L, respectively. Figure 5 Generation Maraviroc supplier of ROS in RTL-W1, T47Dluc, and H295R cells. ROS generated in RTL-W1 (A), T47Dluc (B), and H295R (C) cells exposed to MWCNT, selleckchem TCC, and mixture of both substances (1% TCC, with respect to the concentration of CNT). The intensity of H2DCF-DA was measured in cell lysates and normalized to negative/solvent control (=1, dashed line). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three independent exposure experiments with three internal replicates each. *Statistically significant from the negative control in repeated measures ANOVA on ranks with Dunn’s post hoc and p < 0.05. Discussion Multiwalled carbon nanotubes In the case of long and stiff CNT, it has been argued that analogous

mechanisms to those of other fibrous particles such as asbestos exist [96, 97], which may penetrate the lung and persist in Forskolin clinical trial the tissue. The biopersistence, large aspect ratio, and fibrogenic character of CNT are important features that may cause adverse health effects. Other mechanisms include hydrophobic contact, through which nanoparticles may interrupt cell membranes, disturbing surface protein receptors [98]. Uptake of nanofibers by human macrophages sized smaller than the length of the nanotubes – a process defined as frustrated phagocytosis – has been shown by backscatter scanning electron microscopy [13]. Overall, nanomaterial size and composition plays a distinct role in the cellular response. In addition, this response is variable between cell types and is likely

related to the physiological function of the cell types [95]. However, in our study, flexible multiwalled CNT were investigated for which less concern of their toxic potential has been expressed [99]. Cytotoxicity Exposure of RTL-W1, T47Dluc, and H295R cells to 50 mg CNT/L for 24 or 48 h did not induce acute cell toxicity. This is the first study reporting data of cytotoxicity tests with Baytubes using these three cell lines. Several authors have shown that other types of CNT were cytotoxic to different lung epithelial cell lines [100–102], to human astrocyte D384 cells [100], to skin keratinocyte cells, lung cells, T4 lymphocytes [103], and human epidermal keratinocytes [18]. However, in a recent study, Thurnherr et al. [8] also showed that the same type of industrially produced MWCNT had no effect to another cell line.

Most of the residual defects on the machining-induced surface are making an angle of 90° with the cutting direction. In this case, most of the surface residual defects 3-deazaneplanocin A move to either [ī0ī] or [ī01] crystal orientations, which also run parallel with the three slip vectors in the FCC crystal. Because of the different cutting directions on the surface, the quality and distribution of residual defects in the damaged layer in the surface are not the same. Once the nanoindentation test begins, this balance is immediately broken,

and the bulk glides are more likely to take place along specific directions. More details about the generated dislocations derived from the residual defects in the subsurface during nanoindentation Apoptosis inhibitor are in the following paragraph. Figure 8 The top view of the machining-induced surface after relaxation in two different cutting directions.

(a) Along [100] and (b) [101] directions. Figure  9 shows the emission of dislocations in the subsurface during nanoindentation beneath the machining-induced surface along the [ī00] and [ī01] crystal orientations, respectively. The machined layer on the surface is invisible for the immobile dislocations make it difficult to identify the newly generated dislocation loops in the surface due to nanoindentation. The movements of partial dislocation loops have often been found in nanoindentation simulations of single-crystal FCC metals in previous studies. They are of great importance in material deformation process because Bay 11-7085 they mediate the plastic deformation. Figure  9 (a1 and a2) shows the cross-sectional view of the specimen beneath the machining-induced surface of 0.28 nm. More dissimilar glide patterns of surface dislocations around the diamond indenter are observed in Figure  9 (a1), which indicates that the extent of the damaged layer under the machined surface along [ī00] is larger than that along [ī01]. The defects around the indenter may lead to the nucleation of dislocations with large hydrostatic pressure under the diamond indenter. Figure  9 (b1 and b2) shows the cross-sectional

view of the specimen beneath the machining-induced surface of 0.51 nm. The directions of the gliding dislocations in the subsurface are implied by the arrows attached to the small circles. The quantity and direction of the dislocations indicate that the subsurface damage is strongly dependent on the nanocutting directions. The number of the dislocations under the machining-induced surface along [ī00] is much larger than that along the [ī01] crystal orientation. As mentioned before, more dislocations beneath the indenter may lead to permanent plastic deformation easily. It is thus well inferred that the hardness of the machining-induced surface along the [ī00] direction is smaller than that along the [ī01] direction. Figure 9 Emission of dislocations.

Methé BA, Nelson KE, Eisen JA, Paulsen IT, Nelson W, Heidelberg JF, Wu D, Wu M, Ward N, Beanan MJ, Dodson RJ, Madupu R, Brinkac LM, Daugherty SC, DeBoy RT, Durkin AS, Gwinn M, Kolonay JF, Sullivan SA, Haft DH, Selengut J, Davidsen TM, Zafar N, White O, Tran B, Romero C, Forberger HA, Weidman J, Khouri H, Feldblyum TV, Utterback TR, Van Aken SE, Lovley DR, Fraser CM: Genome of Geobacter sulfurreducens : metal reduction in subsurface environments. Science 2003, 302:1967–1969.PubMedCrossRef 13. Khan SA: Plasmid rolling-circle replication: highlights of two decades of research.

Plasmid 2005, 53:126–136.PubMedCrossRef 14. Lovley DR, Chapelle FH: Deep subsurface microbial processes. Rev Geophys 1995, 33:365–381.CrossRef 15. Anderson RT, Vrionis HA, Ortiz-Bernad I, Resch CT, Long PE, Dayvault R, Karp K, Marutzky S, selleck kinase inhibitor Metzler DR, Peacock A, White DC, Lowe M, Lovley DR: Stimulating the in situ activity of Geobacter species to remove uranium from the groundwater of a uranium-contaminated aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69:5884–5891.PubMedCrossRef 16. Holmes DE, O’Neil RA, Vrionis HA, N’Guessan LA, Ortiz-Bernad I, Larrahando MJ, Adams LA, Ward JA, Nicoll JS, Nevin KP, Chavan MA, Johnson JP,

EPZ-6438 research buy Long PE, Lovley DR: Subsurface clade of Geobacteraceae that predominates in a diversity of Fe(III)-reducing subsurface environments. ISME J 2007, 1:663–677.PubMedCrossRef 17. Segura D, Mahadevan R, Juarez K, Lovley DR: Computational and experimental analysis of redundancy in the central metabolism of Geobacter sulfurreducens. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4:e36.PubMedCrossRef 18. Wolfe AJ: The acetate switch. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2005, 69:12–50.PubMedCrossRef mafosfamide 19. Grundy FJ, Waters DA, Takova TY, Henkin TM: Identification of genes involved in utilization of acetate and acetoin in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 1993, 10:259–271.PubMedCrossRef 20. Gerhardt A, Cinkaya I, Linder D, Huisman G, Buckel W: Fermentation

of 4-aminobutyrate by Clostridium aminobutyricum : cloning of two genes involved in the formation and dehydration of 4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA. Arch Microbiol 2000, 174:189–199.PubMedCrossRef 21. Butler JE, He Q, Nevin KP, He Z, Zhou J, Lovley DR: Genomic and microarray analysis of aromatics degradation in Geobacter metallireducens and comparison to a Geobacter isolate from a contaminated field site. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:180.PubMedCrossRef 22. Peters F, Heintz D, Johannes J, van Dorsselaer A, Boll M: Genes, enzymes, and regulation of para-cresol metabolism in Geobacter metallireducens. J Bacteriol 2007, 189:4729–4738.PubMedCrossRef 23. Wischgoll S, Heintz D, Peters F, Erxleben A, Sarnighausen E, Reski R, van Dorsselaer A, Boll M: Gene clusters involved in anaerobic benzoate degradation of Geobacter metallireducens. Mol Microbiol 2005, 58:1238–1252.PubMedCrossRef 24. Caccavo F Jr, Lonergan DJ, Lovley DR, Davis M, Stolz JF, McInerney MJ:Geobacter sulfurreducens sp. nov ., a hydrogen- and acetate-oxidizing dissimilatory metal-reducing microorganism.